Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Eric Holder vote coming down | Main | Now, this is a shocker »

If the House REALLY wants to press the contempt issue...

Posted by David Hardy · 28 June 2012 06:09 PM

There is the "inherent contempt" power, where the House orders the arrest of the defendant, and can try him then and there, and pass sentence. It hasn't been used since 1934, when the Senate sentenced a fellow who destroyed evidence to ten days in jail. It was upheld by the Supreme Court in Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935). ("Here, we are concerned, not with an extension of congressional privilege, but with vindication of the established and essential privilege of requiring the production of evidence. For this purpose, the power to punish for a past contempt is an appropriate means.") The House sends out its Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest the defendant, he is tried on the spot, and the House decides whether to convict.

All the more ironic, in that not too many years ago the Demos were suggesting its use against a Republican administration. One pointed out that the the Capitol has an unused jail cell for just that occasion.

Hat tip to Jim Norell, a husband of the late Nancy Norell and a former Senate staffer who reminded me of the Capitol "dungeon."

· BATFE

7 Comments | Leave a comment

George L. Lyon, Jr. | June 28, 2012 9:56 PM | Reply

Holding Holder in contempt of Congress. Well deserved.

Obama claiming executive privilege over documents he denies ever seeing. Astonishing.

Holder having his arrogant perjurious ass thrown in the Capitol jail. Priceless.

Jim D. | June 29, 2012 9:09 AM | Reply

Actually "convicting" him does nothing. He'll be in there for, what, 10 days? They're not going to toss him in the black hole of Calcutta and throw away the key and he's not going to surrender the documents until he loses his sponsorship and gets tossed under the bus. Political blackmail being what it is, that's not going to happen. Obama and Holder are conjoined at the hip and Holder's festering sores are slowly spreading rot into Obamas veins.

As soon as Holder gets arrested and thrown in jail by Congress, Congress loses its moral authority and it's just another tribal dispute in the eyes of the country.

No, much better to let him walk around and try to do his job, make public appearances, speechify about policy -- so that every time he pops his head up to talk about anything, Fast-and-Furious is the first question.

Sooner or later, "What did the President know and when did he know it," will be the question of the day every day.

ParatrooperJJ | June 29, 2012 10:13 AM | Reply

I believe they can actually imprison him untill the next session of Congress starts.

5thofNov | June 29, 2012 10:34 AM | Reply

Lyon, that was great! Now lets do it!..lol.

Zermoid | June 29, 2012 1:44 PM | Reply

"I believe they can actually imprison him untill the next session of Congress starts."

DO IT! DO IT NOW!

Veracitor | June 29, 2012 2:10 PM | Reply

Here's the (recent best law review article) skinny on what the House could (and should) do with Holder:
http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=facpub

Hartley | June 29, 2012 9:37 PM | Reply

Veracitor, that is a fascinating document! I appreciate your bringing it to our attention - I think I learned a great deal about the mess we find ourselves in..

Leave a comment