Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Last minute meetings won't stop contempt vote | Main | If the House REALLY wants to press the contempt issue... »

Eric Holder vote coming down

Posted by David Hardy · 28 June 2012 01:37 PM

Pelosi just announced the Demos will walk out on the vote.

Rep. Chaffetz is kicking ass and taking numbers.

The Demos repeatedly invoke a constitutional duty of the branches of government to cooperate and work with each other. I wonder where that provision is found?

Issa says that the wiretap applications (he cannot give details due to their being under seal) show that high-ups in DoJ (they have to be approved by an Ass't AG, as I recall) show that any reader of them would know that guns were being walked. And this before Brian Terry was killed.

Time for debate has expired. Rep. Dingell moves to remand to committee for additional hearings, largely on Operation Wide Receiver. He chews into ATF leadership pretty well! He says that he's defended the Second Amendment more than any other member of the House (which is a fair claim).

Dingell motion goes to a recorded vote.
It loses.

Now the vote on whether to cite. It passes, supported by 17 Demos. About 100 did walk out.

A second motion to empower the committee to bring a declaratory action in the District Court. The majority wants to move on two fronts, recognizing that the DoJ isn't likely to move fast on charging the AG.

Issa shuts Cummings up, firmly. Good. The guy's tough.

Second resolution is up ... Cummings calls for a recorded vote. (??? why? I was wondering if Pelosi was clever to stage a walk out. NRA was going to score the vote, and probably other groups would do the same. So maybe with a walk-out Demos could say they hadn't voted against it. But now they've returned, and Cummings make a motion that puts their votes on the record, when he could have just let it pass on the voice vote).

Second resolution passes, 255-93, 4 presents and 89 not voting. (I may be a bit off, I missed the last few seconds of the vote). The last number is quite impressive.

· BATFE

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Hideous | June 28, 2012 3:15 PM | Reply

This seems to be a criminal contempt citation. Why didn't the House vote for civil contempt, then send the House Sergeant-at-Arms over to the DOJ to arrest Holder and confine him in the D.C. Jail until he purges his contempt?

Harold | June 28, 2012 6:24 PM | Reply

Because our founders were careful to keep prosecutorial power out of the hands of the Congress. Experience has shown that's a bad idea, and it's part of the essential nature of the Westminster Parliamentary System, where one party (or coalition) gains a monopoly on both legislative and executive power for the duration of their term in office.

Excepting France to a certain extent, and Japan as a very weird (by Western standards) special case, I'm not aware of any other "major" country that divides power all that much, although I haven't done a serious survey.

Harold | June 29, 2012 6:44 AM | Reply

Oops, should have read the front page before making the above comment. Still stand by my last statement, or Clayton Cramer puts it, "My guess is that this might start Civil War 2.0, however. That would not be wise."

Not over this conflict, at least not yet. Haven't read the details of the last use, but destruction of documents certainly warrants it. By comparison, in this case as I've read the House already has many/most? of these documents from leakers, they need them officially confirmed and in some cases unsealed.

Leave a comment