Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« If a robber uses a gun, his victim will just take it away and use it on him | Main | "Media Matters" gets hit hard »

SAF collects another check

Posted by David Hardy · 14 February 2012 08:09 PM

Story here. It's 16K from Omaha, over its ban on gun acquisition by legal aliens, not so impressive as its earlier collection of nearly 400K from Chicago. But sufficient to start sending a message: irrational gun control can hurt a city's bottom line.

· Chicago aftermath

2 Comments | Leave a comment

jay | February 14, 2012 9:01 PM | Reply

if only the lawmakers who passed these laws had to cough up the $16k, instead of the taxpayers of today.

Mountaineer | February 15, 2012 8:21 AM | Reply

+1
@Jay. That's the real problem with these cases. Even if we win, we lose
because we the taxpayers bear the cost and the law creators lose
nothing. Well, hopefully they lose elections...

Leave a comment