Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Rep. Jim Jordan speaks out on ATF raid/homicide | Main | Now, that's awkward timing »

Supreme Court win on 1st Amendment

Posted by David Hardy · 30 May 2024 10:02 AM

NRA v. Vullo, handed down this morning. 9-0, no less!

Not that the good guys are entirely out of the woods -- the Second Circuit had ruled that the suit must be dismissed because (1) there was no First Amendment violation and (2) even if there was the defendant was protected by qualified immunity. The Supreme Court only granted cert. as to (1), and will now remand to the 2nd Circuit, which is free to say, "aha, we rule in NY's favor anyway, on argument (2)!" See slip op. at 7-8, n. 3.

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Old Guy | May 31, 2024 7:27 AM | Reply

Given the recent Trump verdict in NY I would not be surprised if something like that happened

FW | May 31, 2024 7:38 AM | Reply

As Glenn Reynolds points out, there is no statute for qualified immunity thus the judiciary are guilty of legislating and should be impeached and removed from office. Legislating by the judicial branch is "bad" behavior.

Tom | May 31, 2024 9:30 PM | Reply

How can the government have any kind of immunity in a 1st Amendment case?
I mean, that's what the amendment is all about - restricting the government.

Anonymous | June 2, 2024 6:58 AM | Reply

IANAL but doesn't QI only apply to individuals. I don't think an agency has a QI defense. I assume the NRA sued the agency as well.

Leave a comment