Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Restrictive carry bill fails in California! | Main | Mass killing in Canada -- with a knife »

Registration of pistol braces will require a photo of the firearm

Posted by David Hardy · 3 September 2022 11:40 AM

The War on Guns has the story. To register one, you must also send a photo of it.

I bet they are trying to avoid what happened during the 1986 ban on registering newly-made full autos. As the deadline approached, makers of full autos, realizing prices would skyrocket once the ban went into effect, began rushing out and registering receivers. Those who made folded receivers, ones bent out of sheet metal, stamped out as many pieces of sheet metal as they could, stamped them with a serial number, and registered them without finishing them as receivers, then finished making them after registration. As I recall, there was one company that didn't even bother with that, they just registered a lot of serial numbers, then made the receiver and serial numbered them later.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Mike-SMO | September 4, 2022 2:42 AM | Reply

Make sure that all the meta data is off or corrupted if you use a digital camera or smart phone. No point in giving Team Biden your location, phone number or serial number.

dittybopper | September 4, 2022 6:13 AM | Reply

Mike-SMO, you’re not clear on how registration works, are you?

Anonymous | September 4, 2022 2:20 PM | Reply

This is also derived from the learning (by left) of the California (second) AW ban, "SB23" in 1999.

People were buying tons of receivers in 1999 pending special 'grandfather'
registration cutoff at end 2000 (actually, 23 Jan 2001 for AR and AK
'series' guns due to a misprint and the Kasler ruling). They were then slapping the one upper they owned on all receivers and filing witht that physical description of gun - and some certainly filed their 'intented' configuration just having the receiver but no other parts.

Bill Wiese
San Jose CA

Leave a comment