Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Kyle Rittenhouse prosecution's disastrous beginning | Main | The Ammo shortage is getting grim.... »

Latest disaster in Kyle Rittenhouse trial

Posted by David Hardy · 6 November 2021 03:44 PM

Via Instapundit: Prosecutor has eyewitness to the shooting on re-direct. He starts asking, over and over with different wording, "you don't know what was in the mind of the rioter who got shot, do you?" He asks once too often.

"Q. You can't read Rosenbaum's mind, right? You can't know what he was actually thinking, right? Your interpretation of his intent is nothing but complete guesswork, isn't that right?

A. Well, he said 'Fuck you,' and then he reached for the weapon."

Ooops.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Sebastian | November 6, 2021 4:20 PM | Reply

The defense also got entered into evidence that Rosenbaum was bipolar and on psychiatric medicine, because the ADA asked his girlfriend whether he had taken his medication that day. The judged had previously ruled that was inadmissible, but the state opened the door on direct.

Flight-ER-Doc | November 7, 2021 5:52 PM | Reply

What's that rule lawyers have about not asking questions they don't already know the answer to?

Good thing the state can't claim inadequate counsel.

Leave a comment