Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« ATF proposed rule on stabilizing braces | Main | When the other side loses.... »

Thoughts on striking down the Calif "AW ban"

Posted by David Hardy · 8 June 2021 10:41 AM

Thoughts from the from the California Rifle and Pistol Association. With a sad reality:

"We know with certainty that the state will appeal Miller to the Ninth Circuit. It will then take at least a year for a final ruling from a standard three-judge panel if there are no extended delays. But the Miller appeal will almost certainly be stayed at the Ninth Circuit, pending rulings in other important Second Amendment cases--like Duncan, Rhode, and Rupp--that are already on appeal at the Ninth Circuit. So, an extended delay is likely.

Indeed, Second Amendment law in the Ninth Circuit is facing a bottleneck right now. The reason is the extraordinary success of Duncan. Duncan won at both the district court level (in Judge Benitez's courtroom), and then won again before a three-judge panel at the Ninth Circuit. In line with the Ninth Circuit's hostility toward the Second Amendment, an 11-judge en banc panel will rehear Duncan on June 22nd. Because Duncan could have a tremendous impact on Second Amendment law in the Ninth Circuit, other Second Amendment cases at the appeal stage have been "stayed" or "held in abeyance" pending the resolution of the Duncan en banc rehearing. That is the situation with Rupp, Rhode, and likely with Miller."

It could be even worse than that. Back in the 80s, as I recall, the 9th Circuit followed a simple practice in death penalty cases. It would grant a stay of execution, and then never decide the case. Years would go by without a ruling. No one could appeal a decision that hasn't been made. Finally, Arizona asked the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus. I forget the result.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Anonymous | June 8, 2021 5:00 PM | Reply

In 2014 Arizona asked the US Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the 9th Circuit to "issue the mandate" in the death-penalty case of Henry v. Ryan, which was then 28 years old and which the 9th Circuit was stalling long after the 9th Circuit panel had ruled against the murderer for the last time and the Supreme Court itself had denied certiorari. The Supreme Court called for responses to Arizona's petition, including from the 9th Circuit itself, and eventually got a letter in 2015 from the 9th Circuit saying it would stop stalling, after which Arizona asked the Supreme Court to dismiss the petition for a mandamus as moot.

Michael Murray | June 9, 2021 11:24 AM | Reply

As a believer in putting my money where my mouth is, I joined the CRPA. I did this even though I do not (thankfully) live in CA. This group is on the sharp end in the litigation war and deserves our support. They are doing far more than a certain other national organization who has supported every single federal gun law since the NFA of 1934.

RAH | June 10, 2021 12:14 AM | Reply

The saying is how California goes, so does the country. Bad or good. I appreciate the effort of CRPA. If we start winning in the blue anti gun states then we can advance our civil rights wins on gun law.
I am cautiously optimistic on The NYSRA case in SCOTUS

Leave a comment