Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« 2A victory on "nunchuck sticks" | Main | Down with deer! »

Bump stock ban challenged in court

Posted by David Hardy · 18 December 2018 01:20 PM

Filings here. It was filed a few hours ago.

5 Comments | Leave a comment

FWB | December 18, 2018 8:05 PM | Reply

If the federal government needed the 18th amendment to ban booze, where are the amendments authorizing the banning of other things?

rick | December 19, 2018 10:13 AM | Reply

The most egregious thing is Congress delegating not only their authority but their responsibility to unelected bureau-thugs.

FWB | December 19, 2018 2:35 PM | Reply

I believe Congress allows the depts to make their own rules and regs so the members of Congress can say, "I didn't do that!"

Anonymous | December 20, 2018 10:05 AM | Reply

And because of Chevron and Auer there is nothing we can do about it.

FWB | December 20, 2018 6:35 PM | Reply

There is always something the People in their ultimate authority can do about everything and anything the government does. As per the Declaration, We the People retain the Right to alter or abolish that which We the People see as not in our benefit. But we must uneducate the people from the lies the public nee government schools have wrought. The magistrates are not above the people. They are NOT our bosses and they do not have the final say if one is properly educated in the truth of our system of government.

Blackstone stated:

For whenever a question arises between the society at large and any magistrate vested with powers originally delegated by that society, it must be decided by the voice of the society itself: there is not upon earth any other tribunal to resort to.

Sir William Blackstone, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book I, Chp3, pg.205/6

We the People have to retake control. SSM was/is an area where the majority of the people took a stand the Courts, improperly and unlawfully, said no. Our system always functions by majority. See any legislative outcome for evidence.

We are locked in by our own ignorance of Who's the Boss and it is NOT the government.

Leave a comment