Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Detroit Chief of Police says he supports the 2nd Amendment | Main | Family of Santa Barbara killer supports gun control »

I suppose it was inevitable....

Posted by David Hardy · 22 May 2014 09:46 AM

Restaurant with "No Weapons/No Concealed Firearms" Sign Robbed at Gunpoint."

The problem with those signs is that many criminals are illiterate, and thus don't know they aren't allowed to enter with a gun.

9 Comments | Leave a comment

Anonymous | May 22, 2014 10:51 AM | Reply

There are reports of individual anti-gunners putting up no-gun signs on business windows without the business owners being aware of it:

http://www.ncgunblog.com/2013/11/28/strange-deceitful-new-anti-gun-tactic/

Reed | May 22, 2014 11:15 AM | Reply

As you say, the problem must be illiteracy. Literate criminals would obey the signage.

Granny Grunch | May 22, 2014 1:34 PM | Reply

PittBBQDurham........Mt Hater is receiving some interesting comments.

Frank Masotti | May 22, 2014 4:21 PM | Reply

Well they got what they deserved.

Tom | May 22, 2014 5:01 PM | Reply

The ones smart enough to understand the sign are smart enough to know that they most likely won't get shot by a patron while robbing the place.
Might just as have put up a sign that says "Robbers welcome, no one inside is armed"

Jim D. | May 24, 2014 12:10 PM | Reply

We're dealing with two very different cultures here, "ours" and "theirs", both of whom are likely to view this as a cautionary tale.

Our (gun owners) view is that these unarmed fools are willful victims surrendering to, and enabling criminal elements in their natural behavior.

Their (gun prohibitionists) view is that these innocents are victims of an evil gun lobby who enable criminals by providing them access to firearms simply to sustain an illegitimate industry of gun manufacturers.

These two cultures will never merge. They will never agree. One side will eventually win. The other side will become extinct.

KCSteve | May 25, 2014 12:22 PM | Reply

"These two cultures will never merge. They will never agree. One side will eventually win. The other side will become extinct."

Hmmm... Think I'll continue to bet on the side with the guns to win out. If nothing else, they get to have a voice in whether or not they'll be going extinct.

Jim | May 26, 2014 1:15 AM | Reply

In RI we don't have signs like this. Does anyone who carries concealed really pay any attention to these? I would think most people who carry concealed understand that they are, well, carrying concealed...

wrangler5 | May 26, 2014 11:58 AM | Reply

"Concealed means concealed" is an attitude that it may be safe to adopt in states where ignoring a sign carries no criminal sanction. But relying on not being discovered in a state WITH criminal sanctions carries some real risks.

For example, suppose you get severely injured by some fight between two other people, or a chandelier falls on your head, or you have a heart attack, so that you're still on the floor of the restaurant, wearing your (well concealed) gun, when the ambulance folks show up. How do you think that will likely play out? If ignoring the sign is a felony in your state, there's a fair chance you'll never be able to touch a firearm again.

Here in MO I generally ignore the no-gun signs on private businesses, as there's no criminal penalty for doing so. But I have been known to carry my (well concealed) gun into the Post Office to check my PO box on a Sunday, when the building is empty and locked up except for the box lobby. Even though I'm inside for less than 60 seconds, I still worry about having a stroke or heart attack and not being able to get out of the building with my gun. So even though the risk of becoming disabled on any given visit is extremely small, I usually go through the lock-up-the-gun-in-the-car process before I go into the PO, and retrieve it when I get done, simply because the consequences under FEDERAL law of being discovered with a gun in the building are so severe.

Leave a comment