Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Growth of Federal LE | Main | Not a bad idea, actually »

Drake v. Jerejihan cert reply filed.

Posted by David Hardy · 9 April 2014 02:27 PM

This the NJ appeal involving gun permits issued upon a finding of "justifiable need," whatever that means. Scotusblog has pdfs of all the filings. The reply points out that now the Third Circuit, involved in this case, and the Ninth Circuit, which handed down Peruta, are in clear conflict.

The Court will vote on April 18 whether to take it.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Bull | April 9, 2014 6:47 PM | Reply

Keeping my fingers crossed on this one. With the circuits split on such a fundamental question as to whether 2A extends to self-defense by firearm outside the home, I really can't see how SCOTUS can deny cert. Then again, I'm not a lawyer.

Oh, and the case is Drake v Jerejian. No 'h' in Jerejian.

Joel Stoner | April 10, 2014 1:44 AM | Reply

Long reads, but some are interesting. fopefully this will be heard by the SCOTUS.

Jim | April 10, 2014 9:28 AM | Reply

SCOTUS can deny cert for any reason or no reason, and they don't explain why. It could be legal, political or whatever. I'm not too optimistic myself. Still, fingers crossed.

Leave a comment