« An almost full roster of amici | Main | Joyce Fdn's Second Amendment Research Center »
Bloggers take on Brady Campaign brief
Here's the commentary from Snowflakes in Hell, and from Joe Huffman.
3 Comments | Leave a comment
The Brady Center and NAACP LDF briefs are labeled "Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party" which in real life is of course complete nonsense. Is this some legalism or court procedure that briefs opposing the petitioners are so labeled?
The term “reasonable regulation” scares the hell out of me. No legislative body whether it be federal, state, or municipal has ever in the history of mankind passed an “unreasonable regulation”. Six million people went to their deaths, during the late 30’s and early 40’s, and it was all legal. “Reasonable Regulations”.
The Bradys, the International Chiefs of Police, and the Fraternal Order of Police want to maintain the status quo and their control over “we the people”. Whatever the SCOTUS decides, these people will be forever looking for loopholes so that they may maintain control. The Bradys, The ICoP, and the FOoP do not speak for “We the People”. They do not speak for American police chiefs nor for the rank and file police officers. They speak for the money, and for control.
As if the facts mattered. Notice that Saul Cornell's Second Amendment Research Center has vanished, its "scholarly" purpose having coincidentlly expired with the political purpose its critics attributed to it.