Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« An almost full roster of amici | Main | Joyce Fdn's Second Amendment Research Center »

Bloggers take on Brady Campaign brief

Posted by David Hardy · 24 November 2009 07:29 PM

Here's the commentary from Snowflakes in Hell, and from Joe Huffman.

· Chicago gun case

3 Comments | Leave a comment

jnheath | November 25, 2009 8:43 AM | Reply

As if the facts mattered. Notice that Saul Cornell's Second Amendment Research Center has vanished, its "scholarly" purpose having coincidentlly expired with the political purpose its critics attributed to it.

Eric | November 25, 2009 7:37 PM | Reply

The Brady Center and NAACP LDF briefs are labeled "Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party" which in real life is of course complete nonsense. Is this some legalism or court procedure that briefs opposing the petitioners are so labeled?

W. W Woodward | November 27, 2009 8:35 PM | Reply

The term “reasonable regulation” scares the hell out of me. No legislative body whether it be federal, state, or municipal has ever in the history of mankind passed an “unreasonable regulation”. Six million people went to their deaths, during the late 30’s and early 40’s, and it was all legal. “Reasonable Regulations”.


The Bradys, the International Chiefs of Police, and the Fraternal Order of Police want to maintain the status quo and their control over “we the people”. Whatever the SCOTUS decides, these people will be forever looking for loopholes so that they may maintain control. The Bradys, The ICoP, and the FOoP do not speak for “We the People”. They do not speak for American police chiefs nor for the rank and file police officers. They speak for the money, and for control.

Leave a comment