Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Dave Kopel on the PA primary | Main | UN suspends food shipments in Darfur due to inability to protect »

NRA gets court order blocking Philadelphia's new ordinances

Posted by David Hardy · 17 April 2008 10:30 AM

A judge this morning issued an order temporarily enjoining enforcement of the city's new ordinances. The injunction will last at least until the next hearing on April 28.

Another story here.

· State legislation

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Jim D. | April 17, 2008 12:16 PM | Reply

This is how it started in San Francisco with Prop H. The CA NRA attorney loves to tell these kinds of stories because all the stories end with "and they ended up writing the NRA a check for legal fees!"

The uninformed think he makes his money off the NRA. He makes his living representing the NRA, but he makes his money off of the idiots who think the law doesn't apply to them and inflict their absolutist ideologies on their tax-paying electorate (who, by the way, typically reward the idiots with another term in office).

With any luck, Philly will have to pay a big enough reimbursement that it stains the politicians with an unwashable taint.

Carl in Chicago | April 17, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply

...all the stories end with "and they ended up writing the NRA a check for legal fees!"

True. Yet I think the ignorant Philadelphia residents who voted for Nutter and his council out to pay only some of the cost. I think that Nutter and the council, in addition to being removed from office, be forced to personally pay for much of the defense costs for their illegal ordinances. We have got to make this dangerous for the personalities involved. Do you think that Bloomberg would be so bold if he thought his personal fortune was at risk? George Soros? Richard Daley?

I don't think so...

Mainsail | April 17, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply

"Limit firearm purchases to one a month and require buyers to obtain a police certification that they have not purchased another firearm within the previous month."


Did anyone else notice this? Under the law, all a police chief has to do is refuse to issue the certification and no sale can take place.

Flighterdoc, MD | April 18, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply

Public servants such as mayors, city council members, building inspectors, firefighters, district attorneys, law enforcement officers, etc should NOT benefit in any way from any sort of immunity that attaches to their position.

If these people screw up, they should be held personally liable. Just like the rest of us are. In fact, they should be personally liable for damages and also for claims that they acted under color of authority, which most citizens don't benefit from at all.

There would be a LOT fewer stupid laws, and a LOT fewer wrong-house raids, and a LOT fewer crooked politicians and cops if they actually had to live by the same laws as they are supposed to enforce or they passed.

Leave a comment