Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Heller: photo of the usual suspects | Main | Safety tip: do not hide a gun in the oven »

"The Bloomberg Collection?"

Posted by David Hardy · 22 March 2008 02:20 PM

Lauer Custom Weapony, which produces camo paints for firearms, has released The Bloomberg Collection, named after the mayor.

Bloomberg is described as "outraged," but I suppose they could respond, "so sue us."

· antigun groups

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Carl in Chicago | March 22, 2008 7:13 PM | Reply

Personally...I am not that keen on colored guns. But to each their own. After all, the right to expression has been ruled inherent in the first amendment, and the right to keep and bear arms in explicit in the second amendment. And I don't recall any restrictions on color for arms.

I guess this is really just an ironic twist-of-fate for our wealthy and influential friend Michael. Sure, he can whine and moan about how the "rich gun lobby and industry" is stooping to a new and dangerously pathetic low, mocking his "good for the people" common sense gun laws and by claiming outlandish things such as Lauer marketing guns to children.

But really, the lesson here is bigger than that....as they should have learned in the wake of the 1994 semi-auto ban, maybe the gun controllers will learn something this time. Nothing....nothing sells the public on guns, and nothing sells guns to the public, more than gun bans. The irony of it all.

Letalis Maximus, Esq. | March 22, 2008 7:49 PM | Reply

They don't call him "Nanny Bloomberg" for nothing.

Flighterdoc | March 22, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply

Pink guns are really not my taste....but the only thing I'd rather see dura-coated pink other than a gun is hizzoner, hisself.

straightarrrow | March 22, 2008 11:49 PM | Reply

Bloomberg is not outraged. Outrage, even when misplaced is an honest emotion. There isn't a drop of honesty anywhere in that sonofabitch.

He is merely playing to the "club".

Bill Wiese | March 23, 2008 3:37 PM | Reply

Ron Lauer's got some real fight in him.

During the early days of 2006 he was shipping in 'off-list' AR receivers into CA (thru CA FFLs, of course) in spite of initimdation from Calif DOJ Firearms Div - at a time when other vendors of AR receivers were cowed by incorrect (illegal) pronouncements from Calif DOJ Firearms Division.

Hats off to the Lauers.

Bill Wiese
San Jose CA

Leave a comment