Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Good reason to spend the 4th here | Main | Article on Parker in Harvard Law Bulletin »

Strange program in Philadelphia

Posted by David Hardy · 6 July 2007 09:33 AM

According to this story, the city is establishing a program where, if a citizen consents to an officer searching their house for guns, they won't be charged based on any guns found.

I could grasp the idea of an amnesty, but can't see the relevance of consent to search. Of course, the reporter might be off base here. Or maybe the idea is that a person only gets amnesty if he lets officers search the house to make sure that's the only one. (One problem with drafting amnesties, BTW, is figuring out how to exclude someone who's already cornered: you don't want a team to execute a search warrant and be told as they enter "there are sawed-off shotguns upstairs, I want to turn them in and get the benefit of the amnesty."

I'll stay in AZ, thank you. Where if an officer asks you what guns you have in your house, the next question is likely to be how much you want for the Glock.

5 Comments | Leave a comment

TriggerFinger | July 6, 2007 11:05 AM | Reply

Seems to me this is trying to attract consent from individuals who don't own the guns that would be found -- such as parents with criminal offspring living at home, or anti-gun spouses with criminal (or, I suppose, even just gun-owning) partners.

I suspect the police doing the searches won't much care whether the guns they find are "illegal"; they'll take all the guns they find.

The last line of the article is telling. The hotline is to report "guns", not "illegal guns".

Sebastian | July 6, 2007 12:48 PM | Reply

Weird. Possessing a gun in Philadelphia isn't any more a crime than it is in any other part of the state. Unless the person who holds the property is a prohibited person, which a lot of people are in the crappy neighborhoods. I need to link to this and offer my $0.02 :)

Voolfie | July 6, 2007 1:47 PM | Reply

Considering the fear, distrust and downright HATRED that the "target audience" for this proposal feels towards the PPD, I doubt there'll be many takers.

Of course, since the proposal doesn't mention "other" items or substances which may be illegal, it would only take one granny led out of her house in handcuffs for marijuana possession to put this particular program out of business.

Philadelphia is attempting to stop or dissuade people from buying guns in the first place. They've got ads all over saying, "That gun you bought for a criminal could end up killing a child."

Philadelphia is a complete disaster.

Thirdpower | July 6, 2007 3:42 PM | Reply

So technically a pissed off spouse can call while you're at work and have your guns confiscated? I see that occurring more often than any criminal activity being prevented.

AMCer | July 6, 2007 4:49 PM | Reply

Philadelphia can offer whatever shamnesty they want. It won't stop the state from enforcing their gun laws nor the Feds (i.e. sawed off shotguns).

It's a ploy to trick people.

Leave a comment