Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Law.com on Parker | Main | NRO: Second Amendment defenders are winning »

Richardson flip-flop on gun shows?

Posted by David Hardy · 30 July 2007 06:28 AM

Story here.

· Politics

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Jacob | July 30, 2007 11:39 AM | Reply

He's trying to appeal to the kook liberal base of the Democrat party which hates guns and who are the mostly likely to turn out and vote in the primary.

Letalis | July 30, 2007 3:24 PM | Reply

Screw him. He just lost my support. He was whack on the war in Iraq, anyway.

bud | July 31, 2007 12:59 PM | Reply

He's simply a politician looking for votes. When the votes were from gun supporters, he was a gun supporter. Now that he needs votes in the Dem primaries in the "Eeeek, a gun" states, he's sliding in their direction.

If you read the transcript, it's obvious that he really doesn't know much about the issue, especially from a Constitutional viewpoint. He lets Russert get away with a line about "Uzi machine guns" and defining the whole gun control issue as about hunting.

He's just parroting what his pollsters have told him is the maximum vote getting line.

Leave a comment