Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.3
Site Design by Sekimori

« Professor cleared of bringing gun aboard aircraft | Main | No-knock raids and shootings of civilians »

Pro-gun Democrat's take on Michael Moore

Posted by David Hardy · 26 November 2006 02:01 PM

Here it is. BTW, an interesting note, borne out in my experience:

"My wife practices in some of the most dangerous areas of law (child custody, divorce and termination of parental rights), and our lives have been threatened more than once. I can watch out for those people; it's the ones who don't vocalize their intentions that worry me. You are welcome to rely on the government to cover 100 percent of your life, but I plan on exercising a little personal responsibility."

I've never known violence to break out over anything but domestic law. In those fields, I've known one attorney beaten up in the courthouse, someone caught trying to sneak a dagger into juvenile court, and had a former partner, now on the bench, say he'd had to twice call security to break up courtroom brawls. As he said, on the criminal bench you can call a person every name in the book and send him to jail for 20 years, and he shrugs it off. Make a ruling about parenting, and all hell breaks loose.

1 Comment | Leave a comment

The Mechanic | November 27, 2006 7:07 PM | Reply

I'm not convinced. This smells like DemocRATs' spurious "Sportsmen For Kerry" type verbiage. Wait for the other shoe to drop. "Reasonable" increases in restrictions will be floated. Why is Mr. Arnold even a Democrat at all? Call me paranoid. From the Greek that means one who sees patterns not perceived by everyone else.

Leave a comment