Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Pro-gun Democrat's take on Michael Moore | Main | Article on use of shotguns in war »

No-knock raids and shootings of civilians

Posted by David Hardy · 27 November 2006 12:07 PM

Radley Balko has some interesting thoughts.

"The apologists say that if the warrant is legal, and the police have the right to be there, you're pretty much screwed. If the police storm in and you -- not being a drug dealer and consequently having no reason to think the police might break into your home -- mistake them for criminal intruders and meet them with a gun, you are at fault....

On the other hand, if the police break into your home and they mistake the blue cup, TV remote, the t-shirt you're holding to cover your genitals because they broke in while you were sleeping naked, or the glint off your wristwatch for a gun -- and subsequently shoot you (all of these scenarios have actually happened), well, then no one is to blame. Because, you see, SWAT raids are inherently dangerous and volatile, and it's perfectly understandable..."

· General con law

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Jim | November 27, 2006 12:21 PM | Reply

The CATO Institute has an interactive map or "botched" raids and a 100 page report ont he history of SWAT and other tactical teams. Very interesting reading. I would be interested to hear the other side of this story, because I have to believe and hope there is another side.

http://www.cato.org/raidmap/

Dave | November 27, 2006 1:49 PM | Reply

There is another side. These things happen because the elected civilians that should be overseeing the police depts. have been cowed into believing that these policies should be set by the police themselves. Between the police and city attorneys they have been convinced that such matters should be left to the professionals. The trouble with that is that these people are trained to get the perp not to worry about little things like rights. The fact that they are almost never punished by the system leads them to believe that they are above the law. The founders had a good reason for putting civilians in charge.

The Mechanic | November 28, 2006 6:35 PM | Reply

Thats assuming they are legitimate police not MS-13 or or bill collectors or some sort of black ops jackbooted thugs that every agency seems to have these days.

Leave a comment