Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Door to door searches in Austrialia | Main | Yale LJ Pocketpart looking for short articles »

A matter of perspective

Posted by David Hardy · 2 August 2006 09:58 AM

Attorneys come to appreciate matters of witness (or in this case, filming) perspective, and this officer-involved shooting illustrates it quite well.

View this wmv file of it, and you'd swear the officer back-shoots the suspect for no reason at all. View this one from a different angle, and you see the suspect had a gun out, aimed, and you wonder that they didn't fire earlier.

4 Comments

jlbraun | August 2, 2006 10:37 AM

The shootee is holding a cell phone, as has been discussed elsewhere. Still, could have been a cell phone gun, so the police were indeed justified.

KCSteve | August 2, 2006 2:57 PM

JLBraun,

That might be a cell phone - I can't tell from the video. But I can tell that he's holding it extended straight out in both hands in a standard triangle stance and waving it around in a way that looks like a gun. As I said, the video is cruddy enough (at least on my monitor) that I can't tell if the extended portion is a shiny silver cell phone or a shiny silver barrel.

I suspect I'd of dropped him as soon as he started waving whatever it was around like that rather than giving him so much time to obey my commands to drop it.

But that's just my perspective.

beerslurpy | August 3, 2006 12:28 AM

Wow I wouldnt have known that was a cell phone unless you had told me. It seems obvious when you know to look for it, but the guy was holding it so it looked like a gun.

jlbraun | August 3, 2006 11:23 AM

I didn't know if it was or not until I read the original police report. To clarify, I don't have sympathy for the guy, nor do I think that the police shouldn't have reacted the way they did.