Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Right to bear arms in Maryland | Main | Ohio legislation »

Brady Campaign grades the states

Posted by David Hardy · 8 March 2006 09:36 AM

The Brady Campaign has issued its annual press releases announcing the grades it gives different states. So just as an experiment I checked out the States with the *lowest* homicide rates.

Maine, with the lowest rates in the country, draws a D-.

South Dakota, with the second-lowest homicide rate, draws a D.

New Hampshire, the third lowest, gets a D-

The Brady grading criteria give an interesting insight into the question "what do these folks want in the way of laws" (or perhaps more precisely, what are they willing to say they want). Included are, oh, one handgun a month, attorney general able to regulate guns, ballistic fingerprinting, parents punishable for gun access by children, cities able to sue gun mfrs, registration of all guns and permit requirements for handguns, bans on "saturday night specials," backround checks on private sales, bans on assault rifles and large magazines, waiting period for any gun sale, etc.. Oh, and no pre-emption law, so localities can impose regulations beyond this.

Even Massachusetts is regarded as imperfect: it gets an A-, getting dinged for (apparently) no rifle registration, and allowing CCW permits at police discretion.

· antigun groups

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Kristopher | March 8, 2006 11:37 AM | Reply

Wyoming voters have more work to do ... with enough effort, the state can go from "F" to "F-".

me | March 8, 2006 4:09 PM | Reply

Just goes to show you. As much as the Brady folks claim to care about public safety, it's not really public safety they care about: it' their agenda. If innocents must be sacrificed to accomplish the gun control agenda, so be it.

robert | March 8, 2006 5:00 PM | Reply

The Brady Campaign, and Sarah Brady in particular, have the blood of innocents on their hands.

Robert R. | March 13, 2006 6:12 PM | Reply

Oh, and no pre-emption law, so localities can impose regulations beyond this.

Wouldn't that mean localities could pass laws less strict than state and federal law?

[insert sound of crickets chirping here]

Also, has anyone studied whether there's a correlation between the Brady grades and a state's regulation of non-lethal/less-than-lethal devices (eg - pepper spray, tasers)? If so, it would certainly lend credence to the charge that the gun-control lobby is really the anti-self-defense lobby.

Leave a comment