« More "the government will protect you" | Main | Media coverage of gun at rally »
Reply briefs in Chicago gun case
Alan Gura's reply is here, in pdf. It's the reply (last document) on petition for cert. (moving that the Court take the case -- if it does there will be another round of briefing on the question of who should win).
My latest article is quoted at pp. 9-10.
The Court is now in summer recess. It comes back the first Monday in October to start the new Term, and will probably take a vote on this pretty quickly thereafter.
Comments
Since the courts are ALWAYS behind, why the hell do they get ANY recess? I'm all for establishing night and grave yard shifts for judges so that cases can be dealt with 24/7 with no time off for good behavior.
Tiocfaidh ar la!
Posted by: fwb at August 20, 2009 10:32 AM
David, I am pleased to see that article of yours so consistently referenced by Gura. If the high court is to conduct the incorporation analysis required by their later cases ... then the original intent of the 14A will be inescapable.
Thanks again for all your efforts toward a historically honest discussion of the issues at hand.
Posted by: Carl in Chicago at August 20, 2009 05:25 PM