Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Reply briefs in Chicago gun case | Main | If the jackboot fits... »

Media coverage of gun at rally

Posted by David Hardy · 19 August 2009 10:30 PM

Michelle Malkin has a post on how the MSNBC story on how the appearance of a fellow outside the Phoenix rally with a rifle had "racial overtones" because it involved a man of color in the presidency and "white people showing up with guns strapped to their waists," and "anger about a black person being president."

As I noted yesterday, the fellow with the rifle was an African-American. Michelle Malkin notes how carefully MSNBC had to cut footage of the fellow to hide this. If the facts don't fit the story line, keep throwing them out until they do.

6 Comments | Leave a comment

Peter | August 20, 2009 8:03 AM | Reply

What you will never hear from any of the MSM how this event actually illustrates the EXACT OPPOSITE of the "official" narrative.
Can you imagine what would have happened 40+ years ago if a black man had shown up at a presidential appearance with a rifle? Hell, just walking down the street would have gotten him arrested. Or worse.
If you look at the footage what you don't realize is the truly newsworthy event. Here is some middle aged man, white shirt, tie and glasses. He could be a lawyer, maybe a manager or perhaps a plumber who decided to dress up for a rally.
Think about that for a moment, most people viewing the raw footage likely judge the rifleman more by his dress than his skin tone.
This is sensational! 100 years ago, the thought of a black man being anything but some sort of a menial laborer was unthinkable. Yet, today it is so common that we scarcely give it a second thought. In a country with black lawyers, doctors, dentists, TV stars, rock idols, even President of The United States, we have the liberal elites banging away on the tired old drum of "racist".
But then again, these are the same forces banging away on the drums of "sexism" whenever they don't get what they want.
God bless America baby!

Kman | August 20, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply

My thoughts exactly Peter.

Tim Weaver | August 20, 2009 6:21 PM | Reply

Just when you though MSNBC couldn't stoop any lower....

Guy J. Sagi | August 20, 2009 9:22 PM | Reply

So much for the Fourth Estate and fair reporting. Peter's comments are much more eloquent than I could fashion--he's right on.

Alan A. | August 21, 2009 10:42 AM | Reply

The MSNBC crowd is in the midst of a full-blown campaign to demonize anyone anti-Left. Even to the extent of of accusing them of fomenting violence. They were doing this even before the "guns in the crowds" so while it may have played into their meme, their overall theme is no different.

Rivrdog | August 23, 2009 5:48 AM | Reply

Such video scene-cropping is the oldest trick in the videographer's book.

During the 'Nam war, you never saw a group of soldiers in a scene which didn't focus on the surliest, most unkempt troop.

In fact, the use of pano shots to set a scene probably went out with cinema newsreels.

Leave a comment