Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Army's next generation rifle program... | Main | Cases where legal gunowners stopped mass killings »

Decision striking down MO 2A sanctuary law

Posted by David Hardy · 12 March 2023 02:16 PM

Ilya Somin has some thoughts. I had much the same. If a state law simply says that state employees are not to assist in carrying out a federal law, that's perfectly permissible. As to any declarations the law might make, a fight over whether they are right or wrong is hardly "case or controversy."

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Richard | March 21, 2023 3:33 AM | Reply

It is not a flawed decision, it's a lawless one.

FW | March 21, 2023 7:48 AM | Reply

The Constitution for the United States specifically addresses who is to carry out or execute the laws of the Union in Article 1 Section 8 Pp 15. There is no other delegation of authority concerning execution of federal laws. no allowance for federal agencies sto execute the laws of the Union. There are no implied powers, no penumbras, no emanations except in the demented minds of some judges. Or maybe those judges were doing shrooms and had visions.

Leave a comment