Another win (at TRO stage) in New Jersey

LOL...instead of the judge stating repeatedly that the state isn't offering any evidence...why doesn't she tell them to provide ALL evidence of regulations that the state had in 1791 or in a majority states in that year and ALL current analogues that they believe fit their interpretation.

This is more a case of two steps back and one step forward. Nice, I suppose, but it is still harder for people to concealed carry in NY, NJ, CA, HI, etc then it was before Bruen came out. We need a (preferably criminal) solution for these legislators blatantly violating rights somewhere between watering the tree of liberty and impotent raging.

Was anyone expecting that they'd just give up after Bruen? I didn't. Lots of work still to be done.
I agree that criminal or personal financial solutions would be helpful, but I don't expect we'll ever see that.

"We need a (preferably criminal) solution for these legislators blatantly violating rights somewhere between watering the tree of liberty and impotent raging."

I don't understand why a government official acting against the Constitution/Bill of Rights isn't guilty of treason.

Wikipedia tells me they should be guilty of sedition instead, as in the US treason is very narrowly defined.

California is next in the barrel. Portantino (D-Burbank) just introduced a restrictive CCW regime with tons of places labeled sensitive, and features requirements like social media post reviews. If they don't like your politics, or if you don't show proper deference to politicians on social media, no permit for you. Another clown, Damon Connoly (D-Marin), has introduced a bill that would ban the sale of any kind of body armor to most citizens.

These monsters want to make sure that the citizens cannot protect themselves, neither actively nor passively, when out on the mean streets their policies have helped create.

Despicable.