Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Henry Ward Beecher, abolitionist and rifleman | Main | Fourth Circuit: Ban on handgun sales to 18-21 year olds is unconstitutional »

New York State R&P's brief in the Supreme Court

Posted by David Hardy · 13 July 2021 03:29 PM

Is here. Filed today, Amicus briefs in support are due July 20.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Anonymous | July 15, 2021 1:22 PM | Reply

What do you think of the brief?

Carl from Chicago | July 15, 2021 4:01 PM | Reply

Thanks. Been waiting for the next 2A Supreme Court case for 10 years and the makeup of the justices has never looked better (in my lifetime). In my view, Heller pretty much wrote the outcome in this “bear” case already. The brief is very heavy on text, history, and tradition, which it should be.

Leave a comment