Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« I love a story with a happy ending | Main | Virginia court shoots down governor's closure of indoor ranges »

John Lott on California's background checks for ammunition

Posted by David Hardy · 2 May 2020 03:08 PM

At National Review.

"Between July 2019 and January 2020, 101,047 non-prohibited Californians were prevented from buying bullets. By contrast, just 188 prohibited people were denied. That means that for every prohibited person whose purchase was rejected, 537 law-abiding citizens were denied."

4 Comments | Leave a comment

Pete | May 2, 2020 3:23 PM | Reply

It's a feature, not a bug,

Jeff | May 2, 2020 6:45 PM | Reply

And of the 188 prohibited persons, how many were prohibited for inconsequential and decades old crimes that in no way relate to actual dangerousness.

wrangler5 | May 2, 2020 7:51 PM | Reply

If it saves just one child's life . . .

Skinnedknuckles | May 3, 2020 5:23 AM | Reply

Put another way, for every potential criminal "stopped", the constitutional rights of "only" 537 law abiding citizens had to be trampled. :) Almost as effective as Connecticut's Red Flag Law is at stopping suicides.

Leave a comment