Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Doesn't sound good for Florida referendum on an AW ban | Main | More on what is an AR-15 "receiver" »

ATF revising 4473

Posted by David Hardy · 5 February 2020 04:35 PM

Story here. One of the changes is that the buyer can list their sex as male, female, or nonbinary....

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Michael Murray | February 6, 2020 11:54 AM | Reply

Since we can be pretty sure neither the form or the ATF are going away, how about increasing the number of firearms to five or six? Or ten?
Is a decrease to three supposed to make it more difficult for straw buyers? That's a laugh, "illegal" is illegal, just potentially more violations per form. The bad news for legal buyers (as if anyone cares) is it also makes it more costly to purchase not only guns, but also frames, receivers, and especially stripped lowers, which are often bought in multiples.

Marcus Poulin | February 10, 2020 3:57 PM | Reply

How many Millions did this GPO Change Cost?

Leave a comment