Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« NYSRPA v. NY set for oral argument | Main | Santa Clara, CA, sheriff busted for "pay to play" gun permit issuance »

Page on judicial appointments and vacancies

Posted by David Hardy · 26 September 2019 01:45 PM

Very interesting. Among other things, at the outset of the current administration, eleven Circuits had vacancies, most of them had 2-3 vacancies, the Ninth had four. At the moment, two have a single vacancy and one has two vacancies.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

FWB | October 1, 2019 7:49 PM | Reply

Too bad we have to play games getting OUR guy in there. If the judges were honest and honorable we could choose anyone and they would use the law and not their predilections to make decisions. They need to go for a research PhD and learn how to be truly objective and learn to "let the data lead them." And the judiciary needs to learn who's the boss? The Creator or the created. Then learn they are the created and the Constitution is their boss and so they have no authority to define their boss thus no authority to tell the people what the Constitution means.

Michael Murray | October 3, 2019 8:20 PM | Reply

The judiciary is like Gump's box of chocolates. No matter how it is packaged, most often you are left with a bad taste in your mouth.

Leave a comment