Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Information on Vegas shooter's father | Main | "Dear Jimmy Kimmel... »

Interesting thoughts on the development of conservative legal thought

Posted by David Hardy · 3 October 2017 11:51 AM

Over at Law and Liberty. The Heller case (and the advocates who drove it) fit nicely into the concepts expressed, as does Judge Posner's opposition to Heller.

1 Comment | Leave a comment

Respectful Guy | October 3, 2017 11:49 PM | Reply

Hi! I got your new book from Amazon today. I started reading only a little while ago, so I have just gotten to chapter 2. The book is excellent!

Next time let me help you with proofreading :-). On page four, second para from the bottom, you have "Justice Terry abstaining, of course" where you really want Justice *Field* to abstain (since Terry was already dead, though I suppose that would have assured his abstention had he been invited to sit). At the top of page 26 you have an electrical signal travellng through "thousands of feet" of wire in ten nanoseconds. You wanted to write *microseconds* I am sure (since electrical signals take 1-2 nanoseconds to travel one foot, depending mainly on the signal frequency and the type of wire or cable).

After I read more I'll let you know of any other typos I find, so you can get them corrected for the second printing, which I am sure this book deserves.

Thanks!

Leave a comment