Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« We're in the best of hands | Main | John Slaughter reincarnated? »

More trouble for Couric "documentary"

Posted by David Hardy · 3 June 2016 09:32 PM

Now her director is on tape confessing to four felony violations of the Gun Control Act.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Miguel Gonzalez | June 3, 2016 10:33 PM | Reply

As I just told somebody in Twitter: I bet you a Mosin against a Barret nothing will happen.

Nobody will be prosecuted because they are a politically protected species.

fwb | June 6, 2016 8:35 AM | Reply

Which would be a real problem if the federal government constitutionally had authority to have anything other than counterfeiting, piracies and felonies on the high seas, offenses against the law of nations, securing copyrights and patents, and treason as its police powers. ALL other federal criminal statutes are not constitutional and never have been. There are no implied powers to punish for violations of tax laws or commerce laws or anything else. If it's not granted it is withheld. The N&P clause is in the SAME section as the grants of police power to punish counterfeiting, etc. SO if the N&P granted anything, which it does not, then the explicit clauses in Article I section 8 that grant police power are unnecessary and the Framers were stupid. So be it if one wants to read the Constitution in that manner.

Leave a comment