Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Only government actors are safe with arms, part 364 | Main | Peruta v. San Diego argument today »

Colt files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Posted by David Hardy · 15 June 2015 09:24 AM

Story here. Chapter 11 isn't "we're going under" bankruptcy, but more "if you'll hold our creditors at bay, we can make changes and survive (maybe)" bankruptcy.

Given the booming gun economy (last I heard Ruger was running three shifts of workers, factories going 24 hours a day) and the government contract for M4s, I have no idea how they could get into this bind.

8 Comments | Leave a comment

Cory Brickner | June 15, 2015 9:58 AM | Reply

This was a while ago, but their manufacturing plant in CT was pretty old and outdated, plus union wage rates. They have a huge fixed cost structure that any other manufacturer like FN, who has a new state-of-the-art facility in South Carolina, doesn't have to deal with.

homebru | June 15, 2015 10:08 AM | Reply

It isn't hard to do. In tough times, you develop a credit reputation for being a "slow pay". Then, when business explodes, nobody wants to loan you the money to buy the raw materials to fulfill the orders you have on the books. (Said orders not fully prepaid, of course.)

Ian | June 15, 2015 11:19 AM | Reply

Could have something to do with this - long term effects of exiting the retail/consumer market.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/10/11/colt-to-exit-retail-handgun-business/2e0c1089-dee1-404b-a63a-3d5b3a134161/

Mark-1 replied to comment from Ian | June 15, 2015 12:16 PM | Reply

Colt placed all its future on Gov't contracts. The scheme blew up in their corporate faces. I think it also has to do with their product line.

1911 pistol has many manufacturers now at competitive consumer prices.

Python revolver has nice optics, but I've yet to see a Python that didn't shoot loose..even as little as 50-mag rounds.

I think Colt dropped all their other handgun product lines, too.

Dave | June 15, 2015 2:53 PM | Reply

Much of the previous comments on product line are certainly correct, but a major contributor is the financial structure the current owners forced on the firm. Loading it up with unsustainable debt, paying themselves large "consulting" fees made the product choices problems even worse. Greed seems to have gotten the best of them and the Chap. 11 will only allow them to sell off pieces of a once great company.

Eric | June 15, 2015 7:47 PM | Reply

The guy over at Weaponsman.com has a pretty detailed explanation of what Dave above is alluding to. He mentions that the only things that might still have value -- the name and various patents -- have already been mortgaged or otherwise used as collateral for previous loans. There may not be much of value left to sell. Even the building is apparently owned separately by one of the current owners and leased back to Colt.

It's almost as if someone was sent in there to suck out as much money as possible while destroying a gun company.

James N. Gibson | June 15, 2015 8:06 PM | Reply

And in the mean time, Rick Perry is traveling to New England to lobby whats left of Colt and Mossberg into moving to Texas.

Rich | June 16, 2015 8:27 AM | Reply

Back in the 90's when I was going for my MBA I had a finance course that was taught by a person who was very high up in the finance department of Colt Holdings. They explained that Colt Holdings determined that rather than make anything they could make more money and quicker by pushing paper (financial dealings) then they could manufacturing anything. So they were selling off anything to do with manufacturing. That of course imploded and they attempted to go back to manufacturing on the back of government contracts. But in my opinion it was half hearted and there were too many people who just wanted to deal with paper and get the "quick" profit for it to succeed long term. Very sad.

Leave a comment