Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« A Birthday and Fundraising at Consource | Main | Thoughts on the new Vermont laws »

Update on Wrenn v. DC

Posted by David Hardy · 28 May 2015 02:10 PM

The judge believes in moving quickly. He just issue an order that denies DC's motion for an immediate stay (even before Alan Gura filed his opposition to it), sets expedited briefing for a stay on appeal (which is a different sort of stay), and orders oral argument for July 7.

No order on the contempt motion yet, but DC has filed an opposition (which for some reason I can't link in) claiming that it made a mistake when it turned down an applicant for a concealed carry license and that the license will be issued upon her completing the training requirement.

Hat tip to Alice Beard, and to Gene Hoffman of CalGuns Foundation.

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Rich | May 28, 2015 2:27 PM | Reply

re: but DC has filed an opposition claiming that it made a mistake when it turned down an applicant for a concealed carry license and that the license will be issued upon her completing the training requirement.

Which translates to: Gee we didn't think you would take it so personal, but since you did we'll give you the license just don't go ahead with the lawsuit.
What is it that Glenn Reynolds says: punch back twice as hard.

Flight-ER-Doc | May 28, 2015 4:55 PM | Reply

Trying to moot the lawsuit, which allows them to do the same thing to the next poor slave in DC....

Leave a comment