Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Pa preemption lawsuit filed | Main | Academia and enforced conformity »

CA: antigun Kamala Harris bids to replace antigun Sen. Boxer

Posted by David Hardy · 13 January 2015 03:03 PM

So reports Dave Workman. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

· Politics

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Cal | January 15, 2015 3:02 AM | Reply

What is funny is no one north of LA wants her, Harris, anymore then we wanted Boxer.

But the elections in California, and from research I believe this to be also true in most other states, are rampantly fraudulent.

Until we take back our elections people will continue to be placed into office that do not represent the people as they are lawfully required.

But then, lawyers and attorneys also ignore constitutions as the laws they are, with the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it being the supreme LAW that ALL laws in THIS nation must follow. With each state Constitution being the highest LAW of that state except in the few instances that it conflicts with the US Constitution. That both are the contracts that those who serve within our governments are REQUIRED to take a solemn and legally binding Oath (Perjury and other crimes if broken) that they will support and defend and when they do not we cannot get anything "legally done".

That is why they, the judges, and pretty much all other members of the "legal" profession are not respected or trusted.

Then of course, there is the complete and utter disregard by all who are members of one sort or another within the "justice"/"law" field of First Degree Murder continually being practiced as "assassination powers" by Obama (election fraud means that he never has been the US president but is impersonating one) the "secret" courts, etc.

Can you answer me why this goes on here?

Cal | January 15, 2015 11:08 AM | Reply

Clarification of "Obama (election fraud means that he never has been the US president but is impersonating one)"

-- The 2008 Democratic Nominating Committee (DNC) document did not include the normal language stating that Obama was qualified to be a candidate. The 2008 Republican Nominating Committee (RNC) document did, as is normal. This shows that the DNC knew that Obama was not qualified, or why change the form?

-- South Bend, Indiana jury found that Election Fraud put BOTH Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in Indiana in the 2008 election.

Leave a comment