Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Beretta pulls out of Maryland | Main | Prof. Brian Anse Patrick releases "Zombology" »

Radley Balko on race and gun laws

Posted by David Hardy · 23 July 2014 10:53 AM

A most interesting article.

Among other things, he discusses a form of "sting" which has become very popular, and given rise to the concept of "sentencing entrapment." It goes like this: Federal agents recruit an informant and send him out. He tells others that he knows where there is a drug stash house, and he wants to form a gang to rip it off. The house and drugs actually exist only in his imagination. Others agree to join him. He specifies that one or more of them must bring a gun.

Then they charge everyone except the informant with conspiracy -- not to rob, but to possess the drugs for sale (since in any noteworthy quantity, possession for sale carries higher penalties than armed robbery). Since a gun was involved, the charges tack on penalties for that -- 5-10 years consecutive, without probation. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for drug offenses go up steeply with the quantities involved, and since the drug stash house exists only in the informant's imagination, he is free to invent any amount supposedly to be found that, and thus increase the sentences as far as he desires.

One judge (I think it was Posner) has pointed out that the effect of these stings is to protect drug stash houses, which seems a bit paradoxical.

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Frank Masotti | July 23, 2014 12:59 PM | Reply

This does seem like an illegal act on the police part. Like a police officer asking someone to speed to test their radar detector, then giving them a speeding ticket.

fwb | July 24, 2014 8:19 AM | Reply

And of course there was no need for the 18th amendment to allow the federal government the power to ban booze.

The feds DO NOT have constitutional police power to have any of these criminal laws. The feds have police powers in about 6 areas, all explicitly granted.

Some will try to claim the N&P implies the authority BUT that logic fails. If the N&P implies anything, rather than actually being a limitation on legislation, then at least half of the explicitly granted powers did not need to be granted. Those who think the N&P implies other related powers are stating the Framers were too stupid to know what they had and had not allowed. IF the N&P attaches related powers such as police powers then the explicit police powers over piracy and counterfeiting are superfluous. No interpretation of one clause of the Constitution is valid if it causes another clause to be unnecessary. But then those who think the N&P is expansive have trouble with the English language and proper grammar, something the Committee on Style did not have.

All those folks, back to the very first, punished by the feds for any activity not under the granted police powers should be given full pardons and restitution for the illegal acts of the government.

As stated in Story and many others, the police powers were left to the states.

Anonymous | July 26, 2014 5:44 AM | Reply

the link is to the wrong article

Leave a comment