« Prof. Nick Johnson's new book | Main | 1933 Arizona Legislature ... the good old days »
Survey data on handgun bans
An interesting graphic. Starting with the first poll on the subject, in 1959, the support for a handgun ban was in the lead, 60%-38%. From that point on, support fell, with the two levels reaching equality in 1967. Then really began to decline, to where today opposition to a ban leads 74%-25%.
5 Comments | Leave a comment
sorry Typo, that should be: not to say the numbers are NOT valid
I would be curious to hear people's opinions about whether the anti gun people still have enough viability to affect this trend(?)
My first thought is not whether the survey results are trustworthy or indicative of general trends. Typically, these longstanding polling data by relatively scrupulous pollsters (eg. Gallup) are somewhat meaningful.
No ... my first thought is that the prevalence and widespread popularity of liberalized "concealed carry" laws since the early 1990s has done nothing to harm the general acceptance of guns in mainstream society.
Carl from Chicago, yes in general the national pollsters are scrupulous but methodology has changed. The ability to reach people is much more extensive than it was years ago especially in more rural areas.
A different problem for today, Many people no longer have land lines, they rely on cell phones, this is especially of the "younger generation" even up to the thirties and somewhat beyond.
It would be interesting to know more about how they conducted the polls over the years.
Okay not saying the numbers are valid but you need to look at methodology. How was the survey conducted, by mail? by phone. How and where were the survey participants found.
Think on this in 1959 many people still did not have phones in their homes. I grew up in NYC, basically middle class, we moved in 1958 to an apartment that had a phone in it. The apartment that we lived in before that did not have a phone, in fact only one person on my floor had a phone. They were still rare and even rarer in the more rural areas. The respondents may have been mostly from the cities and the more wealthy.
It would be interesting to see the history of there selection process to see ( if they did) how they went about trying to find a representative sample and how they defined representative.