Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« ATF's latest appropriation bill | Main | Antigun politician shows the depth of his knowledge »

DC going to trial over one cartridge

Posted by David Hardy · 21 January 2014 09:33 AM

... and a misfired one, at that. Reporter David Gregory was given a walk on possessing an illegal magazine, but businessman Mark Witaschek is being tried on possession of one shotgun shell (which had proven to be a dud) in his house.

· arms law victims

9 Comments | Leave a comment

Carl from Chicago | January 21, 2014 12:56 PM | Reply

From reading the article, my take is that Mr. Witaschek possesses the savvy to make this go rather badly for the prosecutors.

There are fools, and then there are damned fools.

tom | January 21, 2014 4:09 PM | Reply

If it goes to trial, it would make a good candidate for jury nullification.

Jim D. | January 21, 2014 5:36 PM | Reply

He's completely innocent.

He'll be tried by a jury of his peers who know they can't have firearms or ammunition themselves. The prosecution will tell them he's nobody special, that he's just like them. The law clearly says you can't have ammunition, that there's no excuse and that this is the case they get to decide, not David Gregory's, and furthermore if the police find ammunition in their house, they'll receive the same treatment or worse because now they all clearly know the law.

The jury will likely think, "So why should this fool get away with it when I damn sure won't?"

I predict he'll be found guilty just because he dared to go to trial.

Anonymous | January 22, 2014 5:52 AM | Reply

What do they all not get about "warrantless search?"

Ted | January 22, 2014 6:18 AM | Reply

Does he have a case for malicious prosecution against the government?

rd | January 22, 2014 10:59 AM | Reply

All on the word of a vicious and vindictive ex-wife.

fwb | January 22, 2014 2:28 PM | Reply

But laws, rules, and regs made by the DC Council have no authority. The Constitution clearly and explicitly places exclusive legislative power in the hands of Congress. Congress may not delegate that authority to any other entity. Delegata potestes non potest delegari. Congress has exclusive authority, but not absolute and thus all legislation that Congress passes concerning DC must conform to the Constitution. Even Heller was BS and the legal authorities should have just said the DC Council has no power to make any laws, rules, or regs just as the Constitution explicitly states. Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 17.

Jim D. | February 24, 2014 8:11 PM | Reply

Trial has started; the prosecution has rested. The charges have been downgraded to "attempted possession" with a six month maximum sentence that is not eligible for a jury trial. The same judge allowed Dick Gregory to walk for possession of a 30-round magazine.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/23/trial-mark-witaschek-washington-dc-one-shotgun-she/?page=1

Jim D. | March 26, 2014 7:53 PM | Reply

Guilty, guilty, guilty! Convicted not on the misfired shotgun shell, but on:

"The 25 conical-shaped, .45 caliber bullets, made by Knight out of lead and copper, sat on the judge’s desk. They do not have primer or gunpowder so cannot be propelled. The matching .50 caliber plastic sabots were also in the box."

"MILLER: Exclusive — Shock verdict — Mark Witaschek guilty of possessing muzzleloader bullets in D.C. … while NBC’s David Gregory got off scot free"

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/26/miller-exclusive-shock-verdict-mark-witaschek-guil/?page=all#pagebreak

Leave a comment