Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Fails the BS test to me | Main | NYC: man kills five with knife and machete »

Raid seizes whisteblower records of reporter

Posted by David Hardy · 27 October 2013 04:36 AM

Seems she , and her husband was alleged to have an unregistered firearm. Curiously, a Dept of Homeland Security agent participated in the raid.

Sounds like they forgot that part of the Fourth Amendment that says the warrant must particularly describe the property to be seized...

6 Comments | Leave a comment

Frank Masotti | October 27, 2013 5:35 AM | Reply

It seems with the current government, the constitution doesn't mean a hill of beans.

Roger | October 28, 2013 7:05 AM | Reply

I hope that there will be a massive lawsuit as a result of the governments actions.

Roger

fwb | October 28, 2013 8:07 AM | Reply

Forgot the 4th? Ever since Marshall pulled his incorrect Barron out of the darkness, the 4th hasn't actually applied, at least not the REAL 4th. Incorporation didn't give us the 4th. It gave us some moth-eaten, holey version that the courts created from nothing. The 4th is explicit. The 4th requires ALL searches to be made with a warrant that specifies who and what. And the 4th does not grant the power to burst in in the middle of the night guns ablazing. The 4th allows for a proper and orderly system. And as per Ex Parte Milligan, the 4th and every other part can never be suspended from ANY reason.

It matters not that we are dealing with bad people. In the earlier days, there were people who were just as bad as any today. But then from 1833 until the mid1900s the cops weren't bound by any such restrictions as the 4th because out idiotic courts couldn't understand supreme law of the land.

It isn't just the current government. The very first Congress, made up of 2/3 federalists, began chipping away at the Constitution in order to "correct" all the things the federalists had to give up during the Convention. The reason people seem to think it's the current government is because of a level of ignorance about the real history of the Union called the United States.

Anthony | October 28, 2013 12:56 PM | Reply

FWC has it

There is not a warrant written in the last 100 years that can pass the clear language of the 4th amendment.

Matt | October 30, 2013 2:08 AM | Reply

Maryland has no explicit registration requirement for firearms except for regulated firearms (handguns and some rifles). And then only for those acquired while a Maryland resident. Effective 10/01, certain rifles are now required to be registered when brought into the state but not a crime to possess them. Handguns are grandfathered in.

But there is no violation of the law in Maryland for having an "unregistered firearm". It's not a crime in this state unless the firearm was regulated and acquired out-of-state in violation of Maryland law.

So I am very curious as to why this was grounds for a search warrant.

Anton Sherwood | November 1, 2013 11:52 PM | Reply
That first sentence apparently was meant to begin:
Seems she had published and planned on publishing articles critical of TSA, and her husband...

Leave a comment