Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« More disasters in Milwaukee ATF string | Main | NRA risk management »

Navy Yard shootings and false reports

Posted by David Hardy · 27 September 2013 09:22 PM

Interesting article here. It points out the initial reports said there were two shooters, using AR-15s, and then named as the dead shooter a fellow who was home in Virginia at the time of the shootings and as might be expected, not dead at all. But other than that....

Now in Houston, getting ready to speak at SAF's Gun Rights Policy Conference tomorrow. The hotel is amazing. It's right on the edge of the airport -- I can look out and see planes taxying, and outside smell the burned jet fuel, but inside it's quite quiet.

6 Comments | Leave a comment

Rich | September 28, 2013 6:55 AM | Reply

So somehow we are supposed to be surprised when the press gets it wrong? At this point, and honestly for years now, I believe nothing they tell me. I would check to see if the sun came up if they said it did.
But isn't it funny how fast it died out when the shooter turned to be black.

Ken M | September 28, 2013 9:27 AM | Reply

What amazes me is this phenomenon I've observed over the years: people find that whenever the media treats a topic on which they have real knowledge, they almost always observe that the media has it all wrong. Still, they tend to believe that the media get is right in all other areas.

John Hardin | September 29, 2013 12:36 PM | Reply

@Ken M: You have august company. Michael Crichton dubbed it the "Gell-Mann Amnesia effect" (obfuscated URL to avoid spam blocking, sorry) :

h++p://www,goodreads,com/quotes/65213-briefly-stated-the-gell-mann-amnesia-effect-is-as-follows-you

wrangler5 | September 29, 2013 5:26 PM | Reply

Sort of like this news report?

www dot youtube dot com forward slash watch?v equals sbbI04_TE6I

Brian | October 1, 2013 5:16 PM | Reply

If you ask the average uninformed voter about it, they have the impression that evil AR-15s were involved... The first (false) impression gets imprinted and the low key retractions don't register.

So, for propaganda purposes, if you were unethical, you would sensationally "report" any unverified rumor that fits the narrative that supports your agenda. Not that any of our upstanding, principled, news organizations in the US would do that...

DaveP. | October 2, 2013 5:28 AM | Reply

This is gonna happen, so get used to it. Eyewitness accounts are unreliable and the police can't take chances, so when they get conflicting reports about what the shooter looks like (which is probably gonna be all the time: if you're hanging around long enough to get a really really good description of Mister Psycho you're probably about to move from "Witness" to "Victim"), they report it as "suspected second shooter"- because they can't risk reporting only one shooter and finding out that there's more than one.
The Press, trusting souls that they are, think "suspected" means "fo'realz,yo" and report it as such.

The AR-15 thing is simpler: that's what they want it to be, so that's what they report.

Leave a comment