Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« I think I'll let someone else shoot it | Main | NFA collector suing Baltimore Police »

Maryland situation

Posted by David Hardy · 2 August 2013 05:40 PM

Maryland has a seven day waiting period for background check, applicable to handguns and some long guns. But State Police have been taking around 100 days to perform the check. Surprise, the Baltimore Sun runs with the headline "Guns Released to Buyer with Criminal Histories."

When asked why not just go with the standard NICS check system, the reply is that Maryland has other prohibited person categories beyond the Federal, with the result that a check requires consulting 16 different databases. Let's see ... amend the law, or hire more people (the article says the backlog started building up in January, so there was plenty of warning), sounds like a solution to me.

6 Comments | Leave a comment

Kendal Black | August 2, 2013 7:22 PM | Reply

"A spokeswoman for Gov. Martin O'Malley said the state is hiring more people to address the backlog and is working to automate the system."

Uh, yeah. Fine idea. Carry on, clam diggers. At least the law says the dealer can sell the gun after a week of no denial from the system.

On the good side, My Accokeek Beretta just acquired collector status.

James | August 2, 2013 10:37 PM | Reply

Of course, the Maryland State Police have made it clear that any dealer that DOES release a handgun before the results of the check will lose their license to sell handguns in Maryland...

Ken M | August 3, 2013 6:30 AM | Reply

Massachusetts law mandates that the state either approve or deny license applications within 40 days. Of course most applications currently take around 100 days before the supplicant gets a response. People and significant number of legislators have been complaining for several years, but both the administration and the legislature have refused to address the problem. After all, laws are made for the little people, not the rulers.

Chris (Mainsail) | August 3, 2013 9:41 AM | Reply

...and I can walk into my local gun shop and walk out with the handgun of my choice in less than 20 minutes. Why isn't there blood running in the streets?

Jim D. | August 3, 2013 11:54 AM | Reply

I would think that presumption of innocence would apply and the burden would be on the government to deny for cause rather than investigate the innocent. The way it's set up now, it's a secret trial with the police as the judge and jury.

Deep Lurker | August 5, 2013 5:32 PM | Reply

It's not just this law; there are a whole bunch of laws, covering any number of activities, passed to get around that "pesky" presumption of innocence thing. Instead of the government having to prove that a person has committed an actual malum in se crime, the person has to keep records, or undergo background checks, or fulfill reporting requirements to show that he hasn't committed the crime. And if he messes up on the record-keeping or reporting requirement, he gets nailed - never mind that he never committed the actual crime that the law was supposedly passed to address.

Leave a comment