This should lead to disbarment

For testifying truthfully?

Unprotected Whistleblower. Told the Defense about favorable evidence that wasn't disclosed by the Prosecutor. Prosecutor decided the guy "wasn't trustworthy".

Yeah, I think Corey is the untrustworthy one. Geez I thought lawyers, whatever side of the court they're on, are 'officers of the court' and have certain responsibilities as well as perks. I guess that's unless you have connections.

Need a new clerk, there, David? He comes recommended as highly ethical.

Quite the dilemma for scumbag government officials. They need IT services, but they can't count on intelligent IT guys keeping quiet when they see their employers doing wrong.

Does the ex-IT guy have grounds for a defamation suit or is the prosecutor immune?

I'm the "other" voice. The IT guy should have been fired a long time ago. His disclosure concerning the Z trial was but a single item in a long list of offenses the SAO detailed in the letter telling him he was fired.

Having said that, I find nothing wrong with Fate allowing the SAO until now to issue his termination notice.

stay safe.

Except that less than two months ago he was given a raise for "meritorious performance". Your handle is certainly appropriate; you're full of it.

It looks to me like the "long list" of prior misconduct was a few petty discrepancies that they used to bolster their decision. It is clear from reading the entire letter that there was really only one reason that they fired him: he revealed their corruption. Mr. Kruidbos should hold his head high. I hope he lands in a better place.

SDN, clearly, then, "Meritorious Service" which warranted any amount of a raise in this economy is part and parcel of the "long list of offenses the SAO detailed in the letter telling him he was fired."

That and Skidmark's remarks are yet more risible actions in this Moscow show trial.