Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« The "assault weapon" "ban" and political theater | Main | Some good news »

Magpul will never be called indecisive

Posted by David Hardy · 19 March 2013 12:47 PM

They'd said they'd move out of Colorado if the ban on 10+ round magazines passed, and here's the core of their reaction to its signing into law:

"We will start our transition out of the state almost immediately, and we will prioritize moving magazine manufacturing operations first. We expect the first PMAGs to be made outside CO within 30 days of the signing, with the rest to follow in phases."

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Cory Brickner | March 19, 2013 1:39 PM | Reply

Saw your comment there. I agree they should move here to AZ. If the states want to destroy the freedoms of their citizens, business should set an example and leave the state. Along with companies not selling to state agencies. Not only does it set an example, it is the ethical thing to do.

Jim K | March 20, 2013 7:30 AM | Reply

If I were them I would put at least two to three states between my company's location and California. AZ will eventually have the same Californian liberal invasion as CO has gone through.

Tom in Seattle | March 20, 2013 2:40 PM | Reply

If other non-firearm companies also leave Colorado for the same reason, that would send an even more powerful message.

Leave a comment