Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Washington Post misses the real issue | Main | Piers Morgan gets owned, again »

Washington Post on NRA origins

Posted by David Hardy · 13 January 2013 08:19 AM

An amazingly impartial article. There are a few minor factual errors, but those are the inevitable product of having to rely upon hearsay, relating to events decades ago, and aren't slanted.

[UPDATE: If you're commenting and get blocked, try dropping your email address. I had to block gmail, yahoo and a few others because of unbelievable waves of spam comments, robot generated and coming sometimes at a dozen per minute, but set it so you can comment while leaving no email address at all]

· NRA

9 Comments | Leave a comment

Anonymous | January 13, 2013 12:18 PM | Reply

Mr. Hardy, if you can find the time, would you mind posting corrections to the factual errors?

I would love to use this piece of journalism with my history students as evidence that they cannot rely on the popular media for historical context, i.e., as evidence that they need to consult historical sources.

Thank you.

FredB | January 13, 2013 1:34 PM | Reply

It's not all that impartial. If you want to talk about the NRA as a civil rights organization then talk about the NRA as a civil rights organization.

Carlton Heston was a classic Hollywood liberal. Ahead of his time, he was marching with Martin Luther King in 1963. As Screen Actors' Guild President he used his influence to introduce civil rights leaders to the technical union representatives, helping to open those unions to minorities. I believe he saw his NRA presence as a continuation of his civil rights work.

Roy Innis, National Chairman of the Congress of Racial Equality, is a member of the NRA's board of directors. He also chairs the NRA's Urban Affairs Committee.

There is much more that is similarly widely ignored.

james N. Gibson | January 13, 2013 1:58 PM | Reply

Were is the history: according to this article the NRA didn't exist until the late 1970s when this revolt occurred among sportsmen. Its in line with gun centralist history that the purpose of the second amendment was to maintain hunting and sporting rights. Nothing about support government efforts post Civil War to maintain a pool of marksmen for possible Federal service.

Kirk Parker | January 13, 2013 4:16 PM | Reply

Here's on subtly misleading quote: "It taught Boy Scouts how to shoot safely." Earth to WaPo writers: it still does!

Kirk Parker | January 13, 2013 4:18 PM | Reply

Here's another: "Closely aligned with the Republican Party". Yeah, right, tell that to Harry Reid and John Dingell.

Jim | January 13, 2013 5:31 PM | Reply

Actually, they opposed Reid in his last election. Do you suppose this is his chance to get even?

Eric | January 13, 2013 5:52 PM | Reply

Some random thoughts:

Yes, closely aligned with the Republican Party, but WaPo fails to give the reason; because the Democrats as a Party ran away from civil rights in favor of centralized power. Sure there are some Dems who support gun rights, and sure there are some Republicans who don't. But as a political party, borrowing Ronald Reagan's line, "the NRA didn't leave the Democratic Party; the Democratic Party left America."

Probably too bad Wayne LaPierre and the others didn't get some quotes in. That police chief association guy whined about the NRA not playing ball with them, but again, the WaPo omits the reason -- it's because those organizations try to "fight gun crime" by restricting the good guys, not the criminals.

Anonymous | January 13, 2013 6:52 PM | Reply

Could it be that, in this one instance at least, the Post is post-Post?

Ric James | January 13, 2013 7:59 PM | Reply

I'm afraid I have to disagree with some previous comments. First, the easy one, the article explicitly states the NRA's founding as an organization to foster marksmanship, right here at the top of page 2 online:

"The National Rifle Association was founded in 1871 by National Guard and retired Army officers in New York who vowed to “promote rifle practice” and improve marksmanship. The first president, Civil War general Ambrose Burnside, had seen too many Union soldiers who couldn’t shoot straight. "

However, I can also say that it's not that impartial. The author of this story isn't the kind of flaming nutball a Piers Morgan would be, no, but there's definitely the sense they convey that the NRA was just fine and honorable right up until they started focusing on supporting the exercise of 2nd Amendment rights. It's not a poison-pen assault on the NRA but it's most certainly slanted to make the current NRA look like a twisted version of what was once a fine organization.

Leave a comment