Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Texan sees LEO in danger, flanks the perp, and takes him out | Main | Not Bloomberg's best day »

Here's what I'd been working on...

Posted by David Hardy · 8 August 2012 12:56 PM

I wasn't doing much blogging for several days, in order to produce this. It's filed in the Woollard case, which challenges the Maryland carry permit's being based on amorphous standards that amount to "we can deny permits to anyone, or grant them to almost anyone, so unless you're a good buddy, don't bother applying for one."

It's a BIG pdf that takes about 30 seconds to download. That's because there's 20+ pages of scanned paperwork in it.

UPDATE: Here's the brief it was opposing. Again, a big pdf. Both are online courtesy of Gene Hoffman of CalGuns. Here's a link to all, or I think all, the briefs filed.

· Chicago aftermath

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Cory Brickner | August 8, 2012 2:31 PM | Reply

Thanks for all your work on this!

David E. Young | August 8, 2012 3:16 PM | Reply

David,

Do you have a link to the brief filed by the historians supporting reversal in Woollard?

George L. Lyon, Jr. | August 8, 2012 4:02 PM | Reply

David, excellent work.

Justin Eagle | August 8, 2012 7:54 PM | Reply

If you're actually using Adobe Acrobat to produce your PDF's, check out the "Document", "Reduce File Size" function. I just ran it on your file and reduced it from 10MB to 3MB with no noticeable decrease in quality. I only point it out since you mentioned the file size.

Great work, and thank you for taking the time to produce this!

Carl from Chicago | August 9, 2012 3:05 PM | Reply

David, congrats and thanks again for another great brief.

Leave a comment