Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« California "bullet button ban" fails in committee | Main | "Gunwalking" a .50 Barrett »

Alan Korwin sues Phoenix over bus stop ads

Posted by David Hardy · 16 August 2012 09:47 PM

Gun activist Alan Korwin contracted to place advertising posters on Phoenix bus shelters, promoting firearms training. The Phoenix transit agency ordered them taken down because of their policy of allowing advertising only of speech that “proposes a commercial transaction.” The Goldwater Institute filed suit on his behalf, arguing a First Amendment violation (which I think it surely is). Word now is that oral argument is set for August 23.

1 Comment | Leave a comment

Sarah | August 20, 2012 11:01 AM | Reply

I’m actually not sure how to feel on this one. I’d like to think he’s protected by freedom of speech, but I do believe that any public service has the right to choose who can and cannot advertise with them, unless it’s clearly defined they intentionally leave the space available for anyone.

Leave a comment