Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« More on Waco | Main | AK-12 »

Fast and Furious: Holder and Napolitano have never spoken about it

Posted by David Hardy · 16 February 2012 07:35 AM

What we have here is a problem with communication:

""I have not," Napolitano answered when asked during a House hearing if she had talked about Operation Fast and Furious with Holder. To explain their lack of communication, she observed that "it's been under investigation here and with the inspector general, and there was no occasion to do so.""

An agency, answering to Holder, was responsible for killing an agent working for Napalitano. But that's no reason for raise the subject, in the year-plus since it came to light.

It's amazing how tolerant we (or at least the media) are to governmental moronity. If a subdivision of Colt or DPMS were knowingly arming the drug cartels, and the president of the company, a year later, said he'd not bothered to discuss it with anyone, there would be (justified) cries for his head. Heads of private entities are expected to be sane and not morons. Heads of government agencies, on the other hand....

· BATFE

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Bill | February 16, 2012 7:37 PM | Reply

And if you believe that there have not been discussions, I have a nice little bridge to sell you........

Jim D. | February 16, 2012 11:16 PM | Reply

If they're not talking, they're obviously playing "No Peek Hold'em".

Somebody's bluff is gonna get called.

DirtCrashr | February 17, 2012 5:17 PM | Reply

I for one am glad they are morons and exhibit morno-behavior, I just wish they were an even lower grade of Moron however, because some spark of cunning remains.

Leave a comment