Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Washington Post on Operation Gunwalker | Main | Too late for Uberti and I »

New CA case challenges DV conviction ban

Posted by David Hardy · 26 June 2011 09:09 PM

It's Enos v. Holder, brought by Don Kilmer, and sponsored by the Madison Society. Complaint is here (scanned pdfs, so they load slowly).

· Chicago aftermath

3 Comments | Leave a comment

Alice | June 27, 2011 9:54 AM | Reply

Wow! Go Don!

Anonymous | June 27, 2011 12:30 PM | Reply

Very interesting case. Don Kilmer is throwing half of the bill of rights at the Feds. This is not just a second amendment case. Think 10th amendment.

Gene Hoffman | June 27, 2011 6:10 PM | Reply

This case has to be read in parallel with US v Skoien out of CA-7...

-Gene

Leave a comment