Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Canadian refuses to register, govt tries to forfeit his house | Main | Mental commitment, disarmament, and standard of proof »

New article on McDonald and Privileges or Immunities

Posted by David Hardy · 8 October 2010 09:41 AM

"The Tell-Tale Privileges or Immunities Clause" by Alan Gura, Ilya Shapiro, and Josh Blackman.

Abstract:

Help is on the way! That’s the Supreme Court’s most readily obvious message for those Americans living in the small handful of states that don’t respect the right to keep and bear arms. It should not have been a surprise. Two years ago, in striking down the District of Columbia’s handgun and functional firearms bans, the high court provided a none-too-subtle message to recalcitrant politicians unwilling to obey national civil rights standards. Ancient cases refusing to apply the right to arms against the states, said the Court, had also failed to apply the First Amendment, and were based on obsolete thinking. This term, in McDonald v. City of Chicago, Heller’s wink-and-nudge became a shove, finally dragging anti-gun politicians into the late 19th century.

But at exactly what part of the late-19th century have we arrived? The heady days of the Fourteenth Amendment’s first five years, when it was understood that states were actually bound to respect Americans’ basic rights? Or the century’s last three years, with the Fourteenth Amendment’s central guarantee of freedom having been parodied into a dead letter, the Supreme Court setting about to pick and choose which rights are worth securing, and to what extent? It is this answer to this question, more than the result applying the right to arms, which promises to make McDonald an enduring landmark of American liberty for years to come.

Hat tip to Joe Olson...

· 14th Amendment

2 Comments | Leave a comment

Tarn Helm | October 9, 2010 11:42 AM | Reply

Very good article.

Frank Perdicaro | October 10, 2010 9:52 PM | Reply

Good piece.
The authors seems to ask what Scalia is worried about when reading the plain text of the 14th.

I have 2 theories.
1) Scalia is not yet ready to discard GCA '68
and NFA '34, which pretty much would be required
if a normal English speaker read the 14th.

2) Scalia is holding his originalist powder for
the 10th amendment question of how the 2nd
modified the Commerce Clause. If 'no clause in the Constitution could be "intended to be without effect"', then the 2nd prevents the Feds from
regulating firearms via the Commerce Clause.
The 2nd is more recent law, and is thus controlling.

Anybody with a pulse should be able to figure that one out.

Leave a comment