« Dave Kopel's testimony on the Kagan nomination | Main | This settles one thing »
Reaction to McDonald v. Chicago
In the wake of the decision, the Jackson County (WI) prosecutor has announced he's no longer taking CCW and similar gun cases.
"Prior to this historic ruling, our state Supreme Court placed the state’s interests first, and
would only create an exception to these laws when the individual’s need for protection
outweighed the state’s interest. In the area of concealed carry, only 2 cases have
approved concealed carry, one at home, and the other one at the defendant’s personallyowned
place of business. Well, as the United States Supreme Court held yesterday, that
view was exactly backward.
As with the other fundamental rights, such as the freedom of speech, of religion, of
association, or of security in our homes, persons, and effects, government limitations on
fundamental rights are lawful only in the rare case that the state can show a compelling
governmental need that can be accomplished only by enacting a narrowly-tailored
restriction, in terms of time, place and manner. Clearly, a blanket prohibition against
carrying your loaded firearm in your personal vehicle does not pass that test."
Hat tip to reader Dave Van...
4 Comments | Leave a comment
I love this site....A big thank you to Mr. Fox...Think I'll shoot him an email for this well written letter. I love it when people get it.
"Only by the strictest adherence to firearm safety rules and common sense will we
show that the elitists who seek to disarm all of us are wrong, and that every law abiding
citizen can be trusted to protect themselves and their neighbors safely."
This is in rural Wisconsin on I-94, located roughly between Eau Claire, Madison and La Crosse. Unbelievably, it is located deep in the progressive heart of the state. Population is about 20,000. The DA's office is held for two years and elected during even numbered years.
He's up for re-election. Might make for an effective donation!
Given the fact that our state has a stronger RKBA provision than the 2nd Amendment, I'm confused as to why he's doing this now. I think this is political cover for the shitstorm this November; he does have a (D) after his name, after all...
A courageous public servant!