Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.6.2
Site Design by Sekimori

« Border issues in the old days | Main | Sup. Ct. reaffirms that use of machinegun is an element, not a sentencing factor »

Rumors about Vets' Affairs being party to disarming vets

Posted by David Hardy · 22 May 2010 09:40 AM

A report has been going around the internet that someone (unnamed) was asked three questions by a Vet Affairs screener and then told, off the record, that if he'd answered any "yes" he would have been reported to DHS and he would be disarmed. I found the report very fishy, and it appears to be without foundation.

Here's the response of the Military Officers Ass'n of America.

Here's VA Watchdog's response.

1 Comment | Leave a comment

Byron Dickens | May 24, 2010 11:06 AM | Reply

I wonder why anyone believes this garbage.

None of those three things are disqualifiers in Texas for a CHL.

There are enough real threats to our rights without people making up bogus claims. I wonder if it is the anti crowd who circulates this junk in order to misdirect people away from the real threats.

Leave a comment