Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.8
Site Design by Sekimori

« Pictures from the McDonald v. Chicago argument | Main | Starbucks and the Supreme Court »

Interesting article on an aspect of the Tiahrt Amendment

Posted by David Hardy · 7 March 2010 03:40 PM

I knew that the Amendment bans release of gun trace data to cities seeking to sue firearms dealers, but I didn't know that it also declares any such data admissible in evidence. This article argues that the latter restriction, as applied to State courts, is unconstitutional. I wonder, however, whether the fact that the restriction pertains to data originating in Federal investigations, with an allegation that its release might compromise those investigations, doesn't make this more of a "necessary and proper clause" case than a commerce clause case.

5 Comments | Leave a comment

Eric | March 7, 2010 4:03 PM | Reply

I think you have a type with the word "admissible."

Eric | March 7, 2010 4:03 PM | Reply

Dang. And I have a typO with the word typE. aaack.

5thofNov | March 7, 2010 8:15 PM | Reply

Eric...LMAO Your in for post of the year!!

Jeff Dege | March 8, 2010 3:45 PM | Reply

I find his characterization that Chicago sued Beretta "in an effort to stem the rising tide of gun violence" to be, at best, misstated.

What we had, rather, is an effort made up of equal parts political grand-standing and legal fortune-seeking, that was quite properly cut off at the knees. There was never any reasonable expectation that the lawsuits, had they proceeded, would have reduced crime. The only conceivable outcome would have been to 1, cripple or destroy the gun industry, 2, to help anti-gun politicians get re-elected in anti-gun districts, and 3, to help a handful of opportunistic lawyers get rich.

So when I hear a lawyer talking about how the Tiahrt Amendment is preventing cities from properly proceeding with these nuisance lawsuits, what I hear is a lawyer whining about how Congress has ruined his chances at a share of a gun-industry equivalent of the tobacco settlements.

Colin Miller | March 8, 2010 6:50 PM | Reply

Jeff,

Thanks for the comment. I don't take a position on the true motives behind Chicago's lawsuit or the propriety of the Tiahrt Amendment. In terms of the Commerce Clause analysis, the only issue is that Chicago claims that it is using such lawsuits to prevent crime. And, as Lopez and Morrison held, Congress is not in a position to override that stated attempt, unless the activity regulated falls under one of the three Lopez categories. The Tiahrt Amendment could be harmful or beneficial to law enforcement. I am merely claiming that it is unconstitutional.

Leave a comment