Of Arms and the Law

Navigation
About Me
Contact Me
Archives
XML Feed
Home


Law Review Articles
Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Armed Citizens, Citizen Armies
2nd Amendment & Historiography
The Lecture Notes of St. George Tucker
Original Popular Understanding of the 14th Amendment
Originalism and its Tools


2nd Amendment Discussions

1982 Senate Judiciary Comm. Report
2004 Dept of Justice Report
US v. Emerson (5th Cir. 2001)

Click here to join the NRA (or renew your membership) online! Special discount: annual membership $25 (reg. $35) for a great magazine and benefits.

Recommended Websites
Ammo.com, deals on ammunition
Scopesfield: rifle scope guide
Ohioans for Concealed Carry
Clean Up ATF (heartburn for headquarters)
Concealed Carry Today
Knives Infinity, blades of all types
Buckeye Firearms Association
NFA Owners' Association
Leatherman Multi-tools And Knives
The Nuge Board
Dave Kopel
Steve Halbrook
Gunblog community
Dave Hardy
Bardwell's NFA Page
2nd Amendment Documentary
Clayton Cramer
Constitutional Classics
Law Reviews
NRA news online
Sporting Outdoors blog
Blogroll
Instapundit
Upland Feathers
Instapunk
Volokh Conspiracy
Alphecca
Gun Rights
Gun Trust Lawyer NFA blog
The Big Bore Chronicles
Good for the Country
Knife Rights.org
Geeks with Guns
Hugh Hewitt
How Appealing
Moorewatch
Moorelies
The Price of Liberty
Search
Email Subscription
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

 

Credits
Powered by Movable Type 6.8.7
Site Design by Sekimori

« Prof. Aynes' recent 14th Amendment writings | Main | Bureaucratic memories »

Ooops...

Posted by David Hardy · 15 February 2010 04:48 PM

ATF issues permits for importation of 13,000 barrel shrouds, then decides they are silencers. From the description, it sounds as if the shrouds are designed to look like suppressors, but the barrel really extends to the front end of it ... in which event I can't see how they could suppress the sound any.

UPDATE: at AR15.com, they ask some interesting questions. For example, if it is indeed a silencer, why is ATF asking them to ship it back to the manufacturer for modification? Wouldn't that involve sending an NFA device in interstate commerce without a permit? And transferring an unregistered NFA device?

· BATFE

6 Comments | Leave a comment

Big Boy | February 15, 2010 5:21 PM | Reply

With the possible exception of you, Dave, government employment usually coincides with senility.

Rivrdog | February 15, 2010 8:52 PM | Reply

file this one under "problems associated with going Tommy Tactical. If and when I buy an AR, the only thing I'm going to hang on it will be a better sight.

Tom | February 16, 2010 12:14 AM | Reply

OK, I'll bite. Why would a FAKE suppressor generate so much interest and why would there be so many people buying them?

A. Nony Mouse | February 16, 2010 3:17 AM | Reply

To strictly follow the law, once they are determined to be silencers they should be abandoned to ATF, unless they declare an amnesty (i.e. Streetsweepers, etc.). In the past when rulings like this have been made, they have been known to contact (either directly or through the retailer) those who bought the contraband item and require them to effect surrender somehow. With very small numbers, like the Akins Accelerator, they even go door-to-door.



A very interesting case, there will probably be repercussions.



Why would a FAKE suppressor generate so much interest and why would there be so many people buying them?



Because (a) the long barrel sticking out looks stupid, and (b) it's part of a clone of the MP5SD, which is supposed to have a silencer in it (hence SD: Schalldämpfer), so it's entirely cosmetic. ATF probably thinks it's too easy to drill some holes in it and make it a crude muffler.

Dan Hamilton | February 16, 2010 12:26 PM | Reply

The ATF with no idea what it is doing. Saying one thing then turning 180 degrees. Costing people money and time.

The ATF is never wrong.

ATF telling dealers that they are only selling 12 weapons a year so they don't sell enough to be dealers.

At the same time.

ATF telling people they would be charged because they were dealing without a lience. They were selling less then 12 weapons in a year.

ATF stupid, ingorant, not a clue. They aren't smart enough to lie. That would mean that they know the truth.

happycynic | February 17, 2010 11:25 AM | Reply

Tom,

Fake silencers are often used simply to make certain types of firearms more realistic and/or better looking. Semi-auto versions of guns like the MP-5, P90, Uzi, etc. simply look "off" with that extra half foot of barrel sticking out beyond the frame. If you turn those last few inches of barrel into something that resembles a silencer it ends up looking better/more realistic to many.

Leave a comment